12 min read Updated 3 Jan 2026

Most Reliable Ford Models: Real MOT Data Analysis

We analysed 4,432,652 real UK MOT tests to reveal which Ford models pass most often, which years to buy, and which to avoid entirely.

4,432,652 MOT tests analysed

Real DVSA data covering every Ford model from 2000-2023

Key Findings

Most Reliable Model

Ford PUMA

90.5% pass rate

Best Single Year

MONDEO 2015 Petrol

86.0% pass rate

Ford vs National Average

68.5% vs 71.5%

-3.0% below average

Proven Durability Champion

MONDEO 2012

+8.1% at 11-12 years

Ford has built its reputation on reliability, but does the data back it up? We analysed 4,432,652 real MOT tests from the DVSA database to find out exactly which Ford models live up to the hype and which ones fall short.

This isn't survey data or owner opinions. These are actual pass/fail results from UK garages, covering every Ford model sold in the UK from 2000 to 2023.

How Ford Compares to Rivals

Ford ranks #51 out of 75 manufacturers with a 68.5% average MOT pass rate. That's below the national average of 71.5%:

Manufacturer Pass Rate Rank Tests Analysed
Volkswagen 72.2% #43 2,967,545
Ford 68.5% #51 4,432,652
Peugeot 66.1% #58 1,428,753
Vauxhall 65.4% #59 3,038,498
Citroen 63.1% #61 1,028,111
Renault 61.8% #66 1,009,899

The verdict: Volkswagen maintains a lead among competitors, while Ford sits at #51. However, newer Ford models significantly outperform this average.

Best Ford Models by MOT Pass Rate

Looking at overall reliability across all years, here's how Ford's core models rank against the 71.5% national average:

Model Pass Rate vs National (71.5%) Tests Years
PUMA 90.5% +19.0% 28,592 2000-2021
CHAUSSON 90.2% +18.7% 713 2018-2020
ROLLER TEAM 88.5% +17.0% 828 2016-2020
EDGE 84.8% +13.3% 8,798 2016-2019
MUSTANG 83.5% +11.9% 10,707 2005-2020
ECOSPORT 80.8% +9.3% 97,906 2014-2021
FREEDOM 80.4% +8.9% 1,312 2016-2020
ALLIED 79.8% +8.3% 3,384 2017-2020
KUGA 79.6% +8.1% 271,185 2008-2021
TOURNEO 77.2% +5.7% 31,205 2013-2022

Top performer

The PUMA dramatically outperforms other Fords with an 90.5% pass rate, putting it among the most reliable cars in the database.

Proven Durability Champions: Which Ford Models Age Best?

These Ford models have proven their durability with 11+ years of real-world MOT data. They're compared against the national average for cars of the same age:

Overall Ford Durability Rating: Below Average

High-confidence data: Only vehicles with 11+ years of MOT history and 500+ tests are included in this ranking.

Model Year Fuel vs Same-Age Average Tested At Pass Rate
MONDEO 2012 Petrol +8.1% 11-12 years 70.9%
FUSION 2009 Petrol +7.9% 13+ years 65.2%
FUSION 2011 Petrol +7.5% 11-12 years 70.3%
MONDEO 2010 Petrol +7.2% 13+ years 64.5%
C-MAX 2012 Petrol +6.8% 11-12 years 69.7%
MONDEO 2011 Petrol +5.3% 11-12 years 68.2%
FUSION 2010 Petrol +5.3% 11-12 years 68.2%
FUSION 2010 Petrol +5.2% 13+ years 62.5%
FUSION 2008 Petrol +5.2% 13+ years 62.5%
PUMA 2000 Petrol +5.2% 13+ years 62.5%

How to read this: A score of "+15%" means the model passes MOTs 15 percentage points more often than the average car of the same age. These are proven results from vehicles that have genuinely aged well.

Early Performers: Strong Start, Unproven Durability

These newer Ford models (3-6 years old) show strong early results, but haven't yet proven long-term durability:

Important caveat: Durability NOT yet proven - these vehicles have not been tested at older ages. Older versions of the same model may tell a different story at 11+ years.

Model Year Fuel vs Same-Age Average Tested At Pass Rate
PUMA ST-LINE X FIRST ED MHEV 2020 Petrol +6.7% 3-4 years 92.5%
MONDEO 2016 Petrol +5.9% 5-6 years 87.1%
KA 2019 Petrol +4.8% 3-4 years 90.6%
FOCUS 2017 Petrol +4.5% 5-6 years 85.7%
KA 2017 Petrol +4.3% 5-6 years 85.5%
EDGE 2017 Diesel +3.9% 5-6 years 85.1%
FOCUS 2016 Petrol +3.5% 5-6 years 84.7%
KUGA 2017 Diesel +3.5% 5-6 years 84.7%

What this means: These models are performing well in their early years, but we recommend checking the Durability Champions section above to see how older versions of the same model family have fared over time.

Ford KUGA: Year-by-Year Breakdown

The KUGA has 271,185 tests in our database with an overall 79.6% pass rate:

Year Fuel Pass Rate vs Same-Year Avg Tests
2021 Diesel 89.2% -1.7% 342
2020 Petrol 91.9% +4.2% 2,940
2020 Hybrid Electric 91.6% +4.0% 2,603
2020 Diesel 89.3% +1.7% 8,921
2019 Petrol 86.6% +0.4% 18,049
2019 Diesel 86.5% +0.2% 22,949
2018 Petrol 85.3% +1.1% 12,009
2018 Diesel 84.9% +0.7% 26,854
2017 Diesel 84.7% +3.0% 30,318
2017 Petrol 83.9% +2.2% 6,675
2016 Petrol 82.6% +4.0% 5,113
2016 Diesel 82.2% +3.6% 28,304
...
2010 Petrol 59.6% -0.9% 280
2010 Diesel 59.2% -1.3% 9,491
2009 Diesel 58.9% -0.1% 7,951

KUGA verdict: Avoid the 2010 petrol (59.6%).

Avoid early KUGA models

The 2010 petrol KUGA has a 59.6% pass rate, failing MOTs more often than passing.

Ford Hybrids vs Petrol vs Diesel

Ford's fuel type comparison shows clear differences in reliability:

Fuel Type Average Pass Rate vs National Tests
Hybrid Electric 88.0% +16.5% 5,530
Electric 83.2% +11.7% 369
Petrol 69.2% -2.3% 2,505,350
Diesel 67.3% -4.2% 1,898,133

The hybrid advantage: Ford hybrids pass MOTs 19% more often than petrols and 21% more often than diesels.

Ford Models to Avoid

Not all Fords are reliable. These specific model/year combinations have failure rates well above average:

Model Year Fuel Pass Rate Tests
FIESTA 2016 Diesel 62.5% (-17.6% vs same-age) 11,964
TRANSIT CUSTOM 300LEADER EBLUE 2020 Diesel 71.7% (-17.7% vs same-age) 4,587
TRANSIT 2012 Diesel 50.0% (-19.0% vs same-age) 16,374
FIESTA 2014 Diesel 57.2% (-17.3% vs same-age) 15,755
TRANSIT CONNECT 2019 Diesel 72.5% 14,653
TRANSIT COURIER 2016 Diesel 65.0% (-15.1% vs same-age) 2,679
TRANSIT COURIER 2020 Petrol 74.5% 901
GALAXY 2014 Diesel 58.6% (-15.9% vs same-age) 4,753
TRANSIT COURIER 2015 Diesel 62.4% (-14.8% vs same-age) 3,457
TRANSIT 2011 Diesel 49.9% (-16.6% vs same-age) 20,391

Pattern to avoid

Early 2014-2016 diesel FIESTAs, 2011-2012 diesel TRANSITs, 2015-2020 diesel/petrol TRANSIT COURIERs are the models that drag down Ford's average. The TRANSIT 2010 performs 14% worse than the average car of the same age at 11-12 years - this is proven poor durability. These vehicles fail MOTs more often than they pass.

What Goes Wrong on Fords?

When Fords fail MOTs, these are the most common causes:

Failure Category Total Failures
1. Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 631,815
2. Suspension 449,341
3. Tyres 310,417
4. Brakes 284,308
5. Visibility 221,485
6. Body, chassis, structure 172,380
7. Noise, emissions and leaks 153,572

Pre-MOT checklist for Ford owners:

  • Check all bulbs (number plate lights are commonly missed)
  • Inspect suspension bushes and anti-roll bar links
  • Ensure tyres meet 1.6mm tread requirement
  • Check brake pad thickness and disc condition
  • Clean windscreen and check wiper blade condition

Frequently Asked Questions

Based on 4,432,652 MOT tests, the Ford PUMA is the most reliable Ford with an 90.5% pass rate.
Ford ranks #51 out of 75 manufacturers with a 68.5% average MOT pass rate. This places them behind Volkswagen, but ahead of Peugeot, Vauxhall, Citroen.
Avoid the TRANSIT 2012 diesel (50% pass rate), TRANSIT 2011 diesel (50% pass rate). These models fail MOTs at nearly double the national average rate.
Yes. Ford hybrids average 88.0% MOT pass rate compared to 69.2% for petrol and 67.3% for diesel.

Our Buying Recommendations

Best If Buying Nearly New

2019-2023 models with highest early pass rates

  • PUMA TITANIUM FIRST ED MHEV 2020 Petrol: 94% pass rate
  • PUMA TITANIUM 2020 Petrol: 94% pass rate
  • PUMA ST-LINE X FIRST ED + MHEV 2020 Petrol: 93% pass rate

Note: Long-term durability not yet proven for these newer models

Best If Buying Used (Proven)

11+ years of proven durability data

  • MONDEO 2008-2012: +6% vs same-age (proven at 11+ years)
  • FUSION 2008-2011: +6% vs same-age (proven at 11+ years)
  • C-MAX 2011-2012: +6% vs same-age (proven at 11+ years)
  • PUMA 2000: +5% vs same-age (proven at 11+ years)

Ford Models to Avoid (Proven Poor)

Proven below average at 11+ years - not just old, genuinely problematic

  • TRANSIT 2010-2012: -13% vs same-age (proven poor at 11+ years) (Below average durability at 11-12 years)
  • TRANSIT CONNECT 2003-2011: -10% vs same-age (proven poor at 11+ years) (Below average durability at 11-12 years)
  • MONDEO 2003: -10% vs same-age (proven poor at 11+ years) (Below average durability at 13+ years)
  • S-MAX 2006: -10% vs same-age (proven poor at 11+ years) (Below average durability at 13+ years)

About This Data

This analysis uses real MOT test results from the DVSA database, covering 4,432,652 tests on Ford vehicles between 2000 and 2023.

Year-Adjusted Scoring (v2.1): In year-by-year breakdowns, each vehicle is compared against the national average for vehicles of the same model year. This removes the natural bias where newer cars pass more often, allowing fair comparisons across eras.

Evidence-Tiered Durability: We separate "proven durability" (vehicles tested at 11+ years old) from "early performers" (3-6 years old). Only vehicles with proven long-term data are used for durability claims. Age-band comparisons use weighted national averages.

Minimum thresholds: 500 tests for proven durability rankings, 1,000 tests for early performer rankings. Pass rates are calculated as first-time passes, excluding retests.

The overall national average MOT pass rate is 71.51% based on 32.3 million tests across all manufacturers. Year-specific averages range from ~59% (2009 vehicles) to ~88% (2020 vehicles).

Check Any Vehicle's MOT History

Get the full MOT history, mileage records, and reliability insights for any UK vehicle. Make an informed decision before you buy.

Run a Free Check