Safety Data 15 min read Updated 3 Jan 2026

The Most Dangerous Cars on UK Roads

We analysed 31,774,780 real UK MOT tests to reveal which cars are most likely to have dangerous defects that make them unsafe to drive.

16,129,910 dangerous defects recorded

Real DVSA data from 31,774,780 MOT tests. Dangerous defects mean a vehicle should not be driven until fixed.

Key Findings

Most Dangerous Model

Ford Focus C-Max

7.81% dangerous defect rate

Safest Model

Jaguar I-Pace

1.89% dangerous defect rate

Worst Manufacturer

Chrysler

6.14% dangerous defect rate

Safest Manufacturer

Bentley

2.29% dangerous defect rate

There's a 4.1x difference between the safest and most dangerous models - choose wisely.

Every year, millions of UK vehicles undergo MOT tests. When an examiner finds a fault so severe that the vehicle should not be driven until it's fixed, it's recorded as a "dangerous defect". These aren't minor issues - they're faults that could cause serious accidents.

We analysed 31,774,780 MOT tests from the official DVSA database to find out which cars are most likely to have these dangerous defects. The results reveal significant differences between manufacturers and models that every car buyer should know about.

The overall dangerous defect rate across all vehicles is 5.11%. But some models have rates more than 4 times higher than the safest cars on the road.

What Makes a Car "Dangerous"?

Two categories dominate dangerous defects: tyres and brakes. Together they account for nearly 99% of all dangerous defects recorded.

Category Occurrences % of All
Tyres 9,931,465 61.6%
Brakes 5,993,759 37.2%
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 102,436 0.6%
Suspension 45,331 0.3%
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 19,161 0.1%
Steering 11,509 0.1%
Noise, emissions and leaks 11,313 0.1%
Road Wheels 10,519 0.1%
Tyres: 61.6%

Worn tread, structural damage, bulges and tears

Brakes: 37.2%

Worn pads, weakened discs, efficiency failures

The 15 Most Dangerous Models

These models have the highest rates of dangerous defects. Many are MPVs and people carriers which tend to be heavier and put more stress on tyres and brakes.

Rank Model Dangerous Rate Tests Years
#1 Ford Focus C-Max 7.81% 180,510 2003-2009
#2 Peugeot 407 7.62% 114,170 2004-2011
#3 Mazda 5 7.52% 122,170 2005-2015
#4 Renault Grand Scenic 7.49% 240,676 2005-2020
#5 Kia Carens 7.31% 153,246 2005-2018
#6 Ford S-Max 7.29% 780,018 2006-2020
#7 Peugeot 307 7.22% 390,110 2001-2009
#8 Renault Laguna 7.10% 111,030 2000-2012
#9 Ford Grand C-Max 7.08% 366,140 2011-2019
#10 Citroen Ds4 7.05% 104,892 2011-2015
#11 Renault Scenic 6.97% 425,656 2001-2019
#12 Vauxhall Zafira 6.92% 2,270,950 2000-2018
#13 Renault Megane 6.85% 1,157,778 2000-2020
#14 Vauxhall Antara 6.82% 221,920 2007-2016
#15 Volvo V50 6.82% 337,326 2004-2012

Pattern Alert

Notice how many Ford MPVs appear in this list: Focus C-MAX, S-MAX, Grand C-MAX, Galaxy, C-MAX, and Mondeo. If buying a used Ford people carrier, budget for brake and tyre maintenance.

The 15 Safest Models

These models have the lowest rates of dangerous defects. Premium sports cars, hybrids, and pickups dominate - often because they're better maintained or built to higher standards.

Rank Model Dangerous Rate Tests Years
#330 Jaguar I-Pace 1.89% 128,650 2018-2021
#329 Fiat Ducato 2.07% 629,910 2000-2020
#328 Peugeot Boxer 2.19% 468,762 2000-2021
#327 London Taxis Int Tx4 2.32% 130,140 2007-2017
#326 Porsche 911 2.35% 379,987 2000-2020
#325 BMW M3 2.43% 141,362 2001-2018
#324 Bentley Continental 2.45% 101,391 2004-2016
#323 Porsche Macan 2.52% 265,732 2014-2021
#322 BMW M4 2.72% 110,291 2014-2020
#321 Hyundai Ioniq 2.88% 333,110 2016-2022
#320 Porsche Cayman 2.96% 122,241 2005-2020
#319 Suzuki Jimny 3.00% 241,300 2000-2020
#318 Land Rover Defender 3.03% 673,840 2000-2016
#317 Mercedes-Benz Sprinter 3.06% 213,055 2000-2021
#316 Ford Mustang 3.06% 105,391 2005-2020

Toyota Prius Stands Out

The Toyota Prius has just a 3.24% dangerous defect rate despite being a high-volume family car with 1,547,358 tests analysed. Its regenerative braking reduces brake wear significantly.

Manufacturer Rankings

We ranked all major manufacturers by their dangerous defect rate. The difference between best and worst is stark - nearly 3x higher for the worst manufacturers.

Worst 20 Manufacturers

Rank Manufacturer Dangerous Rate Tests
#1 Chrysler 6.14% 165,809
#2 Chrysler-Jeep 6.07% 83,678
#3 Alfa Romeo 6.06% 676,555
#4 DS 5.96% 406,169
#5 Citroen 5.83% 10,131,042
#6 Renault 5.82% 9,954,841
#7 Infiniti 5.75% 76,529
#8 Chevrolet 5.74% 622,162
#9 Saab 5.67% 501,504
#10 Vauxhall 5.66% 30,175,115
#11 Nissan 5.48% 15,942,277
#12 Peugeot 5.48% 14,076,539
#13 Volvo 5.43% 5,351,770
#14 Ssangyong 5.41% 205,142
#15 Seat 5.39% 5,372,659
#16 Kia 5.36% 8,713,508
#17 Ford 5.33% 43,970,891
#18 Maserati 5.23% 62,762
#19 Hyundai 5.18% 8,482,847
#20 Volkswagen 5.12% 29,352,581

Safest 10 Manufacturers

Rank Manufacturer Dangerous Rate Tests
#50 Bentley 2.29% 154,205
#49 London Taxis Int 2.35% 138,960
#48 LEVC 2.38% 113,587
#47 Aston Martin 2.43% 141,234
#46 Porsche 2.93% 1,428,136
#45 Isuzu 3.42% 387,170
#44 Lexus 4.17% 1,450,200
#43 Suzuki 4.33% 4,198,408
#42 Toyota 4.36% 15,703,816
#41 Smart 4.36% 75,282

Diesel vs Petrol: Which is Safer?

Diesel vehicles consistently show higher dangerous defect rates than petrol equivalents. The heavier diesel engines put more stress on brakes and tyres.

Fuel Type Dangerous Rate Tests Analysed
Diesel 5.43% 136,598,392
Petrol 4.95% 167,626,961
Electric 3.78% 2,163,557
Hybrid 3.48% 9,075,160

Hybrids are the safest choice

Hybrid vehicles have a 3.48% dangerous defect rate - 36% lower than diesels. Regenerative braking significantly reduces brake wear.

Same Model, Different Fuel: Direct Comparisons

When we compare the exact same model and year in petrol vs diesel, the difference is dramatic:

Model Petrol Rate Diesel Rate Difference
Peugeot Partner 2017 13.3% 50.1% +36.8%
Peugeot Partner 2018 16.4% 46.3% +29.9%
Toyota Verso 2011 52.4% 72.1% +19.7%
Toyota Corolla 2008 56.7% 75.1% +18.4%
Vauxhall Combo 2019 32.9% 51.3% +18.4%
Alfa Romeo Giulietta 2013 54.1% 71.6% +17.5%
Ford Focus 2004 58.2% 74.8% +16.6%
Ford Focus 2007 59.7% 76.3% +16.6%

Used Car Buyer's Safety Guide

If you're buying a used car, this section shows which specific year/model/fuel combinations to avoid - and which are the safest choices.

Avoid: Cars from 2015-2017

Model Year Fuel Dangerous Rate
Ford S-Max 2015 Diesel 69.0%
DS Ds3 2015 Diesel 68.6%
Nissan Juke 2015 Diesel 68.6%
Renault Kadjar 2015 Diesel 68.1%
Nissan Qashqai 2017 Diesel 67.9%
Ford Grand C-Max 2015 Diesel 67.8%
DS Ds3 2016 Diesel 67.2%
Mercedes-Benz Citan 2016 Diesel 67.2%
Citroen C4 Grand Picasso 2017 Diesel 67.1%
Ford Grand C-Max 2016 Diesel 67.1%

Avoid: Cars from 2018-2020

Model Year Fuel Dangerous Rate
Vauxhall Combo 2300 Sportive Td S/S 2020 Diesel 71.1%
Seat Arona 2018 Diesel 67.3%
Citroen C4 Grand Picasso 2018 Diesel 66.5%
Peugeot 5008 2018 Petrol 65.8%
Citroen C3 Aircross 2018 Petrol 65.1%
Renault Kadjar 2018 Diesel 63.7%
Vauxhall Crossland 2018 Diesel 63.4%
Seat Arona 2019 Diesel 63.0%
Jaguar E-Pace 2018 Diesel 62.7%
Peugeot 5008 2018 Diesel 62.3%

Safe Choices: Cars from 2015-2017

Model Year Fuel Dangerous Rate
Fiat Ducato 2016 Diesel 16.5%
Fiat Ducato 2017 Diesel 16.9%
Fiat Ducato 2015 Diesel 17.9%
Peugeot Boxer 2015 Diesel 20.3%
Peugeot Boxer 2016 Diesel 20.4%
Peugeot Boxer 2017 Diesel 22.3%
London Taxis Int Tx4 2015 Diesel 23.2%
Toyota Prius 2017 Hybrid 23.7%
Land Rover Defender 2015 Diesel 24.0%
Toyota Prius 2015 Hybrid 24.4%

Safe Choices: Newer Cars (2018-2020)

Model Year Fuel Dangerous Rate
Fiat Ducato 2019 Diesel 8.0%
Hyundai I20 2020 Petrol 12.1%
Hyundai I10 Se Connect Mpi 2020 Petrol 12.9%
Honda Jazz Ex I-Mmd Cvt 2020 Hybrid 13.5%
Honda Jazz 2020 Petrol 13.7%
Honda Cr-V 2020 Hybrid 14.6%
Porsche 911 2019 Petrol 15.2%
Porsche 911 2018 Petrol 15.6%
Suzuki Celerio 2019 Petrol 15.6%
Ford Fiesta Titanium Turbo Mhev 2020 Petrol 15.7%

Vehicle Deep Dives

A closer look at some popular models - what's actually going wrong? We've analysed both the worst and safest performers to show you exactly where the issues lie.

High-Risk Vehicles

Nissan Qashqai

2007-2021 models (High risk)

6.13%

5,534,140

MOT tests analysed

339,320

Dangerous defects

Tyres

Top defect category

Defects by Category

Tyres 176,484
Brakes 157,443
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 1,914
Suspension 1,692

Most Common Defects

  • less than 1.5 mm thick (Brakes)
  • tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (Tyres)
  • in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (Brakes)
  • has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (Tyres)
  • tread pattern not visible over the whole tread area when minimum depth required is 1.0mm (Tyres)

Vauxhall Zafira

2000-2018 models (High risk)

6.92%

2,270,950

MOT tests analysed

157,227

Dangerous defects

Tyres

Top defect category

Defects by Category

Tyres 92,720
Brakes 62,682
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 1,528
Suspension 187

Most Common Defects

  • tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (Tyres)
  • less than 1.5 mm thick (Brakes)
  • in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (Brakes)
  • has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (Tyres)
  • tread pattern not visible over the whole tread area when minimum depth required is 1.0mm (Tyres)

Ford S-Max

2006-2020 models (High risk)

7.29%

780,018

MOT tests analysed

56,875

Dangerous defects

Tyres

Top defect category

Defects by Category

Tyres 32,524
Brakes 23,600
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 490
Suspension 189

Most Common Defects

  • tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (Tyres)
  • less than 1.5 mm thick (Brakes)
  • in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (Brakes)
  • has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (Tyres)
  • tread pattern not visible over the whole tread area when minimum depth required is 1.0mm (Tyres)

Ford Focus

2000-2021 models (High risk)

5.48%

9,735,308

MOT tests analysed

533,147

Dangerous defects

Tyres

Top defect category

Defects by Category

Tyres 351,894
Brakes 172,062
Suspension 7,389
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 1,489

Most Common Defects

  • tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (Tyres)
  • has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (Tyres)
  • less than 1.5 mm thick (Brakes)
  • in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (Brakes)
  • tread pattern not visible over the whole tread area when minimum depth required is 1.0mm (Tyres)

Toyota Prius

2003-2023 models (Low risk)

3.24%

1,547,358

MOT tests analysed

50,155

Dangerous defects

Tyres

Top defect category

Defects by Category

Tyres 31,289
Brakes 18,183
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 604
Body, chassis, structure 77

Most Common Defects

  • tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (Tyres)
  • less than 1.5 mm thick (Brakes)
  • in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (Brakes)
  • has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (Tyres)
  • tread pattern not visible over the whole tread area when minimum depth required is 1.0mm (Tyres)

Mazda Mx-5

2000-2020 models (Low risk)

3.93%

823,806

MOT tests analysed

32,349

Dangerous defects

Tyres

Top defect category

Defects by Category

Tyres 16,041
Brakes 15,991
Suspension 211
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 106

Most Common Defects

  • in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (Brakes)
  • less than 1.5 mm thick (Brakes)
  • has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (Tyres)
  • tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (Tyres)
  • tread pattern not visible over the whole tread area when minimum depth required is 1.0mm (Tyres)

Porsche 911

2000-2020 models (Low risk)

2.35%

379,987

MOT tests analysed

8,933

Dangerous defects

Tyres

Top defect category

Defects by Category

Tyres 6,125
Brakes 2,745
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 33
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 19

Most Common Defects

  • tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (Tyres)
  • in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (Brakes)
  • has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (Tyres)
  • tread pattern not visible over the whole tread area when minimum depth required is 1.0mm (Tyres)
  • less than 1.5 mm thick (Brakes)

Land Rover Defender

2000-2016 models (Low risk)

3.03%

673,840

MOT tests analysed

20,385

Dangerous defects

Brakes

Top defect category

Defects by Category

Brakes 8,880
Tyres 6,738
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 4,008
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 517

Most Common Defects

  • in such a condition that it is seriously weakened (Brakes)
  • webbing significantly weakened (Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems)
  • less than 1.5 mm thick (Brakes)
  • has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure (Tyres)
  • tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm (Tyres)

Defect Categories: Which Makes Are Worst?

Not all manufacturers have the same weaknesses. Some have particularly high rates of brake issues, while others struggle more with tyres or suspension. Here's the breakdown by defect category.

Brakes Defects by Manufacturer

Brake-related dangerous defects by make

Rank Manufacturer Brakes Rate Tests
#1 DS 9.860% 103,400
#2 Nissan 9.097% 3,916,066
#3 Abarth 8.995% 63,939
#4 Renault 8.752% 2,537,023
#5 Chrysler-Jeep 8.734% 28,680
#6 Infiniti 8.678% 20,708
#7 Mazda 8.390% 1,257,544
#8 Citroen 8.357% 2,736,025
#9 Alfa Romeo 8.193% 203,090
#10 Chrysler 8.113% 53,398

Steering Defects by Manufacturer

Steering-related dangerous defects by make

Rank Manufacturer Steering Rate Tests
#1 Nissan 0.738% 369,710
#2 Vauxhall 0.733% 240,178
#3 Mazda 0.659% 24,414
#4 Mitsubishi 0.617% 31,296
#5 Renault 0.610% 371,761
#6 Kia 0.594% 161,867
#7 Hyundai 0.506% 127,464
#8 Mercedes-Benz 0.487% 30,801
#9 Toyota 0.443% 14,884
#10 Dacia 0.391% 15,091

Suspension Defects by Manufacturer

Suspension-related dangerous defects by make

Rank Manufacturer Suspension Rate Tests
#1 Chrysler 0.917% 11,123
#2 Dacia 0.694% 150,773
#3 Volvo 0.688% 207,216
#4 Ford 0.686% 2,215,931
#5 Mitsubishi 0.609% 206,119
#6 Daihatsu 0.602% 16,939
#7 Chevrolet 0.521% 32,061
#8 Seat 0.497% 149,649
#9 Nissan 0.459% 1,231,863
#10 Renault 0.428% 499,204

Tyres Defects by Manufacturer

Tyre-related dangerous defects by make

Rank Manufacturer Tyres Rate Tests
#1 Chevrolet 7.695% 306,244
#2 Dodge 7.192% 12,153
#3 Chrysler 6.871% 81,661
#4 Chrysler-Jeep 6.556% 36,804
#5 Renault 6.468% 5,339,981
#6 Daihatsu 6.355% 64,749
#7 Citroen 6.276% 5,637,273
#8 Vauxhall 6.159% 17,048,112
#9 Saab 6.152% 268,121
#10 Alfa Romeo 6.149% 389,951

Fair Comparison: 2015 Model Year Only

Older cars naturally have more issues. To make a fair comparison, we looked at vehicles from the same model year (2015) - now approximately 10 years old. This removes age as a confounding factor and shows which manufacturers truly build more durable vehicles.

Why 2015? These cars are old enough to show wear patterns but new enough to have substantial MOT test data. All vehicles are the same age, making this a true apples-to-apples comparison.

Worst Ageing Makes (2015 Models)

Rank Manufacturer Dangerous Rate Tests
#1 DS 6.45% 77,720
#2 Kia 5.86% 730,464
#3 Alfa Romeo 5.83% 46,310
#4 Nissan 5.82% 1,512,464
#5 Citroen 5.79% 928,350
#6 Hyundai 5.76% 759,593
#7 Ssangyong 5.66% 32,220
#8 Renault 5.65% 844,447
#9 MG 5.63% 28,540
#10 Jeep 5.60% 97,300

Best Ageing Makes (2015 Models)

Rank Manufacturer Dangerous Rate Tests
#38 London Taxis Int 2.32% 20,920
#37 Porsche 2.77% 99,695
#36 Isuzu 3.45% 47,080
#35 Lexus 4.08% 109,222
#34 Toyota 4.29% 1,062,099
#33 Mini 4.30% 601,867
#32 Honda 4.42% 501,598
#31 Suzuki 4.47% 318,710
#30 BMW 4.47% 1,476,446
#29 Land Rover 4.58% 675,491

Key Insight

Japanese manufacturers (Toyota, Honda, Mazda) consistently appear in the "best ageing" list, while some European brands show higher wear rates at the same age.

The Most Common Dangerous Defects

These are the specific defects that examiners flag as "dangerous" most often. Most are related to tyre wear and brake pad thickness.

Defect Category Occurrences
Tread depth below requirements of 1.6mm Tyres 5,513,374
Less than 1.5 mm thick Brakes 2,985,190
In such a condition that it is seriously weakened Brakes 2,891,876
Has a tear, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres 2,798,965
Tread pattern not visible over the whole tread area when minimum depth required is 1.0mm Tyres 802,899
Has ply or cords exposed Tyres 429,472
Has a bulge, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres 336,425
Webbing significantly weakened Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems 102,401
Efficiency less than 50% of the required value Brakes 78,865
Has a lump, caused by separation or partial failure of its structure Tyres 40,150
All not working Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment 18,172
Leaking on a hydraulic braking system Brakes 15,148

Prevention is Key

Most dangerous defects are preventable with regular maintenance. Check your tyre tread depth monthly and have your brakes inspected at least annually.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is a "dangerous defect" in an MOT test?

A dangerous defect is a fault so severe that the vehicle should not be driven until it's fixed. These are faults that pose an imminent risk to road safety, such as severely worn tyres or brakes with less than 1.5mm of pad material remaining.

Why do some cars have higher dangerous defect rates?

Several factors contribute: heavier vehicles put more stress on brakes and tyres; diesel engines are heavier than petrol; MPVs and people carriers often carry more weight; and some owners are less diligent about maintenance. Premium cars often have lower rates because owners tend to maintain them better.

Should I avoid buying cars with high dangerous defect rates?

Not necessarily - but you should budget for more frequent maintenance. A Ford S-MAX isn't inherently unsafe; it just needs more attention to brakes and tyres due to its weight. If buying any car on the "worst" list, have a mechanic inspect the brakes and tyres before purchase.

Why are hybrids so much safer?

Hybrid vehicles use regenerative braking, which means the electric motor slows the car down and recharges the battery, reducing wear on the traditional brakes. This is why the Toyota Prius has such a low dangerous defect rate despite being a high-volume family car.

How can I reduce my chances of getting a dangerous defect?

Check your tyre tread depth monthly (legal minimum 1.6mm, but 3mm is safer). Have your brakes inspected annually. Don't ignore warning lights. Keep your car serviced according to the manufacturer's schedule. And consider a pre-MOT inspection to catch issues early.

Methodology

How we calculated these rankings

  • Data source: Official DVSA MOT test data
  • Tests analysed: 31,774,780 MOT tests
  • Definition: Defects classified as 'Dangerous' by DVSA - vehicle should not be driven until fixed
  • Rate calculation: Number of dangerous defect occurrences / Total MOT tests * 100
  • Model rankings: Only models with 100,000+ tests included for statistical significance
  • Manufacturer rankings: Only manufacturers with 50,000+ tests included

Note: A single test can have multiple dangerous defects