Vauxhall Antara 2015: reliability & common MOT faults

Elevated MOT failure patterns for the 2015 Vauxhall Antara include Reversing lamps (rear) (~16.9× peers) and Reversing lamps (~13.9× peers). Based on UK DVSA open data for test year 2025 (877 failed first-attempt tests), compared with similar age and mileage peers. Available test years: 2024, 2025.

Key takeaways before you buy

  • Reversing lamps (rear): about 16.9× more often than similar cars
  • Reversing lamps: about 13.9× more often than similar cars
  • On or after 01/01/2014: about 9.3× more often than similar cars

Common faults

These are MOT failure patterns that show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars of the same class, age band, and mileage in the same test year (leave-one-out peer comparison; whole model family excluded).

Statistical patterns from MOT defect codes — not manufacturer TSBs, recalls, or a diagnosis of any individual car. Fail and advisory patterns are kept separate.

Based on 877 failed first-attempt tests in test year 2025.

Reversing lamps (rear)

This failure pattern appears about 16.9× more often than on similar peer cars — recorded on 23 failed first-attempt tests; 2.6% of failed tests for this model year.

Rear · 23 failures · ×16.9 vs similar cars · 2.6% of failed first tests · Possible elevated fault

Reversing lamps

This failure pattern appears about 13.9× more often than on similar peer cars — recorded on 47 failed first-attempt tests; 5.4% of failed tests for this model year.

Any · 47 failures · ×13.9 vs similar cars · 5.4% of failed first tests · Likely common fault pattern

No patterns met the strongest callout thresholds on this page; showing the highest-lift rows that still cleared the display floors.

# Fault pattern Location Failures vs similar cars Share of fails Confidence
1 Reversing lamps (rear)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Reversing lamps > Reversing lamps
Rear 23 ×16.9 2.6% Possible elevated fault
2 Reversing lamps
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Reversing lamps > Reversing lamps
Any 47 ×13.9 5.4% Likely common fault pattern
3 On or after 01/01/2014
Noise, emissions and leaks > Exhaust emissions > Compression ignition > On or after 01/01/2014
Any 85 ×9.3 9.7% Likely common fault pattern
4 Position lamp (front)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Position lamps > Position lamp
Front 188 ×4.8 21.4% Likely common fault pattern
5 Parking brake performance
Brakes > Brake performance > Parking brake performance > Rbt > Parking brake performance
Any 26 ×4.6 3.0% Possible elevated fault
6 Stop lamp
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Stop lamp
Any 92 ×3.4 10.5% Likely common fault pattern
7 Coil spring (front)
Suspension > Springs > Coil springs > Coil spring
Front 147 ×3.0 16.8% Likely common fault pattern
8 Stop lamp (rear)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Stop lamp
Rear 65 ×2.6 7.4% Possible elevated fault
9 Registration plate lamp(s)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Registration plate lamp(s)
Any 50 ×2.3 5.7% Possible elevated fault
10 Rbt (sp)
Brakes > Brake performance > Parking brake efficiency (sp) > Rbt (sp)
Any 71 ×2.2 8.1% Possible elevated fault

Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown (at least 20 failures and 2.0× peer lift).

Advisories

Advisory items recorded on failed first-attempt tests that appear elevated versus peers. Advisories are not a fail rate — they flag issues noted at the test, often before they become failures.

# Advisory pattern Location Notes vs similar cars Share Confidence
1 Seat belts — Condition (front)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems > Seat belts > Condition
Front 39 ×8.1 4.4% Elevated vs peers
2 Engine oil leaks (front)
Noise, emissions and leaks > Fluid leaks > Engine oil leaks
Front 33 ×5.2 3.8% Elevated vs peers
3 Engine oil leaks
Noise, emissions and leaks > Fluid leaks > Engine oil leaks
Any 175 ×4.6 20.0% Elevated vs peers
4 Sub-frame (rear)
Suspension > Sub-frames > Sub-frame
Rear 50 ×4.4 5.7% Elevated vs peers
5 Suspension arm (rear)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Suspension arm
Rear 40 ×4.4 4.6% Elevated vs peers
6 Pins and bushes (rear)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Pins and bushes
Rear 40 ×3.9 4.6% Elevated vs peers
7 Shock absorbers (front)
Suspension > Shock absorbers
Front 107 ×3.5 12.2% Elevated vs peers
8 Sub-frame (front)
Suspension > Sub-frames > Sub-frame
Front 24 ×2.3 2.7% Elevated vs peers

FAQs

We do not show a single reliability score for the 2015 Vauxhall Antara on this page. Among 877 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Reversing lamps (rear) appears more often than on similar peer cars (about 16.9× more often than peers; 23 observed failures; 2.6% of failed tests). Treat this as a pre-purchase checklist from DVSA open data — not a guarantee for any individual car.
Among failed first-attempt tests we surface patterns that appear more often than on similar peer cars. Top example: Reversing lamps (rear) (about 16.9× more often than peers; 23 observed failures; 2.6% of failed tests). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Reversing lamps (rear) shows up more often than on similar peer cars (about 16.9× more often than peers; 23 observed failures; 2.6% of failed tests). That does not prove a causal design fault — age, mileage, and usage still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase check point, not a manufacturer TSB.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2015 Vauxhall Antara include Reversing lamps (rear), Reversing lamps, On or after 01/01/2014. These are elevated versus similar peer cars where lift clears our floors — not a full list of every possible fault on an individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that look elevated versus peers among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights elevated MOT failure patterns for the 2015 Vauxhall Antara (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are ranked against similar age and mileage peers. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics — not a full service history or manufacturer TSB list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.
PRS means the vehicle failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

About this data

Universe. UK class 4 cars only; normal MOT tests (not retests); results pass, PRS, or fail; one first test per vehicle per calendar year.

PRS policy. PRS means the vehicle failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

Peer baseline. We compare this model year with other class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year, excluding the whole model family so the car is not compared with itself (leave-one-out peer baseline).

Data years. Test years covered: 2024, 2025.

Limitations.

  • MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules — so this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults are inferred from MOT defect statistics, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Matching on age and mileage reduces but does not remove every usage or maintenance difference between cars.
  • Pass rates and star scores appear only when those data marts are available; this page never invents them.

Display rules config: 1

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.