Toyota Hilux 2010: reliability & common MOT faults
Elevated MOT failure patterns for the 2010 Toyota Hilux include Spring mounting prescribed areas (rear) (~25.6× peers) and Chassis condition (~18.4× peers). Based on UK DVSA open data for test year 2025 (895 failed first-attempt tests), compared with similar age and mileage peers. Available test years: 2024, 2025.
Common faults
These are MOT failure patterns that show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars of the same class, age band, and mileage in the same test year (leave-one-out peer comparison; whole model family excluded).
Statistical patterns from MOT defect codes — not manufacturer TSBs, recalls, or a diagnosis of any individual car. Fail and advisory patterns are kept separate.
Based on 895 failed first-attempt tests in test year 2025.
Spring mounting prescribed areas (rear)
This failure pattern appears about 25.6× more often than on similar peer cars — recorded on 35 failed first-attempt tests; 3.9% of failed tests for this model year.
Rear · 35 failures · ×25.6 vs similar cars · 3.9% of failed first tests · Likely common fault pattern
Chassis condition
This failure pattern appears about 18.4× more often than on similar peer cars — recorded on 38 failed first-attempt tests; 4.2% of failed tests for this model year.
Any · 38 failures · ×18.4 vs similar cars · 4.2% of failed first tests · Likely common fault pattern
No patterns met the strongest callout thresholds on this page; showing the highest-lift rows that still cleared the display floors.
| # | Fault pattern | Location | Failures | vs similar cars | Share of fails | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Spring mounting prescribed areas (rear)
Suspension > Springs > Spring mounting prescribed areas
|
Rear | 35 | ×25.6 | 3.9% | Likely common fault pattern |
| 2 |
Chassis condition
Body, chassis, structure > Chassis > Chassis condition
|
Any | 38 | ×18.4 | 4.2% | Likely common fault pattern |
| 3 |
Chassis condition (rear)
Body, chassis, structure > Chassis > Chassis condition
|
Rear | 95 | ×17.7 | 10.6% | Likely common fault pattern |
| 4 |
Prescribed areas (rear)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems > Seat belts > Prescribed areas
|
Rear | 25 | ×13.2 | 2.8% | Possible elevated fault |
| 5 |
Chassis condition (front)
Body, chassis, structure > Chassis > Chassis condition
|
Front | 24 | ×8.3 | 2.7% | Possible elevated fault |
| 6 |
Integral vehicle structure condition (rear)
Body, chassis, structure > Integral vehicle structure > Integral vehicle structure condition
|
Rear | 25 | ×6.4 | 2.8% | Possible elevated fault |
| 7 |
Component mounting prescribed areas (rear)
Suspension > Component mounting prescribed areas
|
Rear | 94 | ×5.2 | 10.5% | Likely common fault pattern |
| 8 |
Rigid brake pipes
Brakes > Rigid brake pipes
|
Any | 22 | ×5.2 | 2.5% | Possible elevated fault |
| 9 |
Rear fog lamp
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Front and rear fog lamps > Rear fog lamp > Rear fog lamp
|
Any | 68 | ×5.0 | 7.6% | Likely common fault pattern |
| 10 |
Rear fog lamp (rear)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Front and rear fog lamps > Rear fog lamp > Rear fog lamp
|
Rear | 38 | ×4.4 | 4.2% | Likely common fault pattern |
Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown (at least 20 failures and 2.0× peer lift).
Advisories
Advisory items recorded on failed first-attempt tests that appear elevated versus peers. Advisories are not a fail rate — they flag issues noted at the test, often before they become failures.
| # | Advisory pattern | Location | Notes | vs similar cars | Share | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Shackle pins and bushes (rear)
Suspension > Springs > Leaf springs > Shackle pins and bushes
|
Rear | 22 | ×54.9 | 2.5% | Elevated vs peers |
| 2 |
Chassis condition
Body, chassis, structure > Chassis > Chassis condition
|
Any | 88 | ×14.5 | 9.8% | Likely common fault pattern |
| 3 |
Chassis condition (rear)
Body, chassis, structure > Chassis > Chassis condition
|
Rear | 65 | ×9.2 | 7.3% | Likely common fault pattern |
| 4 |
Chassis condition (front)
Body, chassis, structure > Chassis > Chassis condition
|
Front | 20 | ×9.2 | 2.2% | Possible elevated fault |
| 5 |
Rigid brake pipes (front)
Brakes > Rigid brake pipes
|
Front | 102 | ×4.1 | 11.4% | Likely common fault pattern |
| 6 |
Integral vehicle structure condition (rear)
Body, chassis, structure > Integral vehicle structure > Integral vehicle structure condition
|
Rear | 20 | ×4.0 | 2.2% | Possible elevated fault |
| 7 |
Rigid brake pipes
Brakes > Rigid brake pipes
|
Any | 61 | ×3.9 | 6.8% | Possible elevated fault |
| 8 |
Headlamp
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Headlamps > Headlamp
|
Any | 25 | ×3.4 | 2.8% | Elevated vs peers |
FAQs
About this data
Universe. UK class 4 cars only; normal MOT tests (not retests); results pass, PRS, or fail; one first test per vehicle per calendar year.
PRS policy. PRS means the vehicle failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.
Peer baseline. We compare this model year with other class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year, excluding the whole model family so the car is not compared with itself (leave-one-out peer baseline).
Data years. Test years covered: 2024, 2025.
Limitations.
- MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules — so this is not a full reliability score.
- Common faults are inferred from MOT defect statistics, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
- Matching on age and mileage reduces but does not remove every usage or maintenance difference between cars.
- Pass rates and star scores appear only when those data marts are available; this page never invents them.
Display rules config: 1
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.