Skoda Octavia 2010: reliability & common MOT faults
Elevated MOT failure patterns for the 2010 Skoda Octavia include Side repeaters (~4.0× peers) and Suspension arm (rear) (~3.4× peers). Based on UK DVSA open data for test year 2025 (3,010 failed first-attempt tests), compared with similar age and mileage peers. Available test years: 2024, 2025.
Common faults
These are MOT failure patterns that show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars of the same class, age band, and mileage in the same test year (leave-one-out peer comparison; whole model family excluded).
Statistical patterns from MOT defect codes — not manufacturer TSBs, recalls, or a diagnosis of any individual car. Fail and advisory patterns are kept separate.
Based on 3,010 failed first-attempt tests in test year 2025.
Side repeaters
This failure pattern appears about 4.0× more often than on similar peer cars — recorded on 210 failed first-attempt tests; 7.0% of failed tests for this model year.
Any · 210 failures · ×4.0 vs similar cars · 7.0% of failed first tests · Likely common fault pattern
Suspension arm (rear)
This failure pattern appears about 3.4× more often than on similar peer cars — recorded on 119 failed first-attempt tests; 4.0% of failed tests for this model year.
Rear · 119 failures · ×3.4 vs similar cars · 4.0% of failed first tests · Likely common fault pattern
No patterns met the strongest callout thresholds on this page; showing the highest-lift rows that still cleared the display floors.
| # | Fault pattern | Location | Failures | vs similar cars | Share of fails | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Side repeaters
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Direction indicators > Flashing type > Side repeaters
|
Any | 210 | ×4.0 | 7.0% | Likely common fault pattern |
| 2 |
Suspension arm (rear)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Suspension arm
|
Rear | 119 | ×3.4 | 4.0% | Likely common fault pattern |
| 3 |
Ball joint dust cover (front)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Ball joint dust cover
|
Front | 218 | ×3.0 | 7.2% | Possible elevated fault |
| 4 |
Anti-lock braking system
Brakes > ABS / EBS / ESC > Anti-lock braking system
|
Any | 204 | ×2.8 | 6.8% | Possible elevated fault |
| 5 |
Individual direction indicators (front)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Direction indicators > Flashing type > Individual direction indicators
|
Front | 89 | ×2.8 | 3.0% | Possible elevated fault |
| 6 |
Electronic stability control
Brakes > ABS / EBS / ESC > Electronic stability control
|
Any | 75 | ×2.3 | 2.5% | Possible elevated fault |
| 7 |
Ball joint dust cover (front)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Ball joint dust cover
|
Front | 104 | ×2.2 | 3.5% | Possible elevated fault |
| 8 |
Linkage ball joint dust cover (front)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Linkage ball joint dust cover
|
Front | 259 | ×2.2 | 8.6% | Possible elevated fault |
| 9 |
SRS malfunction indicator lamp
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems > SRS malfunction indicator lamp
|
Any | 120 | ×2.2 | 4.0% | Possible elevated fault |
Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown (at least 20 failures and 2.0× peer lift).
Advisories
Advisory items recorded on failed first-attempt tests that appear elevated versus peers. Advisories are not a fail rate — they flag issues noted at the test, often before they become failures.
| # | Advisory pattern | Location | Notes | vs similar cars | Share | Confidence |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
Individual direction indicators (front)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Direction indicators > Flashing type > Individual direction indicators
|
Front | 132 | ×5.7 | 4.4% | Possible elevated fault |
| 2 |
Seat belts — Condition (rear)
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems > Seat belts > Condition
|
Rear | 87 | ×4.0 | 2.9% | Elevated vs peers |
| 3 |
Suspension arm (rear)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Suspension arm
|
Rear | 372 | ×3.7 | 12.4% | Likely common fault pattern |
| 4 |
Anti-roll bar (rear)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Anti-roll bar
|
Rear | 46 | ×3.5 | 1.5% | Elevated vs peers |
| 5 |
Shock absorbers (front)
Suspension > Shock absorbers
|
Front | 401 | ×3.1 | 13.3% | Elevated vs peers |
| 6 |
Sub-frame (rear)
Suspension > Sub-frames > Sub-frame
|
Rear | 582 | ×3.0 | 19.3% | Elevated vs peers |
| 7 |
Suspension arm
Suspension > Suspension arms > Suspension arm
|
Any | 26 | ×2.6 | 0.9% | Elevated vs peers |
| 8 |
Pins and bushes (rear)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Pins and bushes
|
Rear | 163 | ×2.0 | 5.4% | Elevated vs peers |
FAQs
About this data
Universe. UK class 4 cars only; normal MOT tests (not retests); results pass, PRS, or fail; one first test per vehicle per calendar year.
PRS policy. PRS means the vehicle failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.
Peer baseline. We compare this model year with other class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year, excluding the whole model family so the car is not compared with itself (leave-one-out peer baseline).
Data years. Test years covered: 2024, 2025.
Limitations.
- MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules — so this is not a full reliability score.
- Common faults are inferred from MOT defect statistics, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
- Matching on age and mileage reduces but does not remove every usage or maintenance difference between cars.
- Pass rates and star scores appear only when those data marts are available; this page never invents them.
Display rules config: 1
Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.