Model Reports 8 min read Updated 12 Jul 2026

Nissan Navara 2014: reliability & common MOT faults

Elevated MOT failure patterns for the 2014 Nissan Navara include Chassis condition (rear) (~123.3× peers) and Component mounting prescribed areas (rear) (~29.0× peers). Based on UK DVSA open data for test year 2025 (1,336 failed first-attempt tests), compared with similar age and mileage peers. Available test years: 2024, 2025.

1,336 failed first-attempt tests · 3,171 first tests (test year 2025)

Standout pattern: Chassis condition (rear) — about 123.3× more often than on similar peer cars.

Key takeaways before you buy

  • Chassis condition (rear): about 123.3× more often than similar cars
  • Component mounting prescribed areas (rear): about 29.0× more often than similar cars
  • Prop shafts — Joints (front): about 27.9× more often than similar cars

Common faults

These are MOT failure patterns that show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars of the same class, age band, and mileage in the same test year (leave-one-out peer comparison; whole model family excluded).

Statistical patterns from MOT defect codes — not manufacturer TSBs, recalls, or a diagnosis of any individual car. Fail and advisory patterns are kept separate.

Based on 1,336 failed first-attempt tests in test year 2025.

Chassis condition (rear)

This failure pattern appears about 123.3× more often than on similar peer cars — recorded on 99 failed first-attempt tests; 7.4% of failed tests for this model year.

Rear · 99 failures · ×123.3 vs similar cars · 7.4% of failed first tests · Likely common fault pattern

Component mounting prescribed areas (rear)

This failure pattern appears about 29.0× more often than on similar peer cars — recorded on 85 failed first-attempt tests; 6.4% of failed tests for this model year.

Rear · 85 failures · ×29.0 vs similar cars · 6.4% of failed first tests · Likely common fault pattern

No patterns met the strongest callout thresholds on this page; showing the highest-lift rows that still cleared the display floors.

# Fault pattern Location Failures vs similar cars Share of fails Confidence
1 Chassis condition (rear)
Body, chassis, structure > Chassis > Chassis condition
 Rear 99 ×123.3 7.4% Likely common fault pattern
2 Component mounting prescribed areas (rear)
Suspension > Component mounting prescribed areas
 Rear 85 ×29.0 6.4% Likely common fault pattern
3 Prop shafts — Joints (front)
Body, chassis, structure > Transmission > Prop shafts > Joints
 Front 48 ×27.9 3.6% Likely common fault pattern
4 Service brake imbalance (rear)
Brakes > Brake performance > Service Brake Efficiency (sp) > Rbt (sp) > Service brake imbalance
 Rear 45 ×5.3 3.4% Likely common fault pattern
5 Electrical equipment — Horn
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Electrical equipment > Horn
 Any 90 ×4.5 6.7% Likely common fault pattern
6 SRS malfunction indicator lamp
Seat belts and supplementary restraint systems > SRS malfunction indicator lamp
 Any 81 ×4.4 6.1% Likely common fault pattern
7 Malfunction indicator lamp
Noise, emissions and leaks > Exhaust emissions > Compression ignition > Malfunction indicator lamp
 Any 178 ×4.3 13.3% Likely common fault pattern
8 Rigid brake pipes (front)
Brakes > Rigid brake pipes
 Front 36 ×4.1 2.7% Likely common fault pattern
9 Wheel bearings (front)
Suspension > Wheel bearings
 Front 56 ×3.9 4.2% Likely common fault pattern
10 Rear fog lamp
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Front and rear fog lamps > Rear fog lamp > Rear fog lamp
 Any 54 ×3.6 4.0% Likely common fault pattern

Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown (at least 20 failures and 2.0× peer lift).

Advisories

Advisory items recorded on failed first-attempt tests that appear elevated versus peers. Advisories are not a fail rate — they flag issues noted at the test, often before they become failures.

# Advisory pattern Location Notes vs similar cars Share Confidence
1 Prop shafts — Joints (front)
Body, chassis, structure > Transmission > Prop shafts > Joints
 Front 39 ×287.5 2.9% Likely common fault pattern
2 Chassis condition
Body, chassis, structure > Chassis > Chassis condition
 Any 63 ×28.3 4.7% Elevated vs peers
3 Chassis condition (rear)
Body, chassis, structure > Chassis > Chassis condition
 Rear 53 ×25.0 4.0% Likely common fault pattern
4 Spring mounting prescribed areas (rear)
Suspension > Springs > Spring mounting prescribed areas
 Rear 21 ×22.6 1.6% Possible elevated fault
5 Ball joint (front)
Suspension > Other suspension component > Ball joint
 Front 21 ×17.3 1.6% Elevated vs peers
6 Wheel bearings (rear)
Suspension > Wheel bearings
 Rear 55 ×11.8 4.1% Elevated vs peers
7 Component mounting prescribed areas (rear)
Suspension > Component mounting prescribed areas
 Rear 26 ×6.5 1.9% Likely common fault pattern
8 Track rod end
Steering > Steering linkage components > Track rod end
 Any 28 ×4.9 2.1% Possible elevated fault

FAQs

We do not show a single reliability score for the 2014 Nissan Navara on this page. Among 1,336 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Chassis condition (rear) appears more often than on similar peer cars (about 123.3× more often than peers; 99 observed failures; 7.4% of failed tests). Treat this as a pre-purchase checklist from DVSA open data — not a guarantee for any individual car.
Among failed first-attempt tests we surface patterns that appear more often than on similar peer cars. Top example: Chassis condition (rear) (about 123.3× more often than peers; 99 observed failures; 7.4% of failed tests). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Chassis condition (rear) shows up more often than on similar peer cars (about 123.3× more often than peers; 99 observed failures; 7.4% of failed tests). That does not prove a causal design fault — age, mileage, and usage still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase check point, not a manufacturer TSB.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2014 Nissan Navara include Chassis condition (rear), Component mounting prescribed areas (rear), Prop shafts — Joints (front). These are elevated versus similar peer cars where lift clears our floors — not a full list of every possible fault on an individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that look elevated versus peers among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights elevated MOT failure patterns for the 2014 Nissan Navara (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are ranked against similar age and mileage peers. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics — not a full service history or manufacturer TSB list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.
PRS means the vehicle failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

About this data

Universe. UK class 4 cars only; normal MOT tests (not retests); results pass, PRS, or fail; one first test per vehicle per calendar year.

PRS policy. PRS means the vehicle failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

Peer baseline. We compare this model year with other class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year, excluding the whole model family so the car is not compared with itself (leave-one-out peer baseline).

Data years. Test years covered: 2024, 2025.

Limitations.

  • MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules — so this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults are inferred from MOT defect statistics, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Matching on age and mileage reduces but does not remove every usage or maintenance difference between cars.
  • Pass rates and star scores appear only when those data marts are available; this page never invents them.

Display rules config: 1

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Most reliable Nissan models

See brand-wide MOT rankings and year guidance for Nissan (separate from this model-year report).