Model Reports 8 min read Updated 12 Jul 2026

Mitsubishi L200 2009: reliability & common MOT faults

Elevated MOT failure patterns for the 2009 Mitsubishi L200 include Rear fog lamp (~7.1× peers). Based on UK DVSA open data for test year 2025 (951 failed first-attempt tests), compared with similar age and mileage peers. Available test years: 2024, 2025.

951 failed first-attempt tests · 1,984 first tests (test year 2025)

Standout pattern: Rear fog lamp — about 7.1× more often than on similar peer cars.

Key takeaways before you buy

Rear fog lamp: about 7.1× more often than similar cars

Common faults

These are MOT failure patterns that show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars of the same class, age band, and mileage in the same test year (leave-one-out peer comparison; whole model family excluded).

Statistical patterns from MOT defect codes — not manufacturer TSBs, recalls, or a diagnosis of any individual car. Fail and advisory patterns are kept separate.

Based on 951 failed first-attempt tests in test year 2025.

Rear fog lamp

This failure pattern appears about 7.1× more often than on similar peer cars — recorded on 106 failed first-attempt tests; 11.1% of failed tests for this model year.

Any · 106 failures · ×7.1 vs similar cars · 11.1% of failed first tests · Strong pattern — appears far more often than similar cars

#	Fault pattern	Location	Failures	vs similar cars	Share of fails	Confidence
1	Leaf spring (rear) Suspension > Springs > Leaf springs > Leaf spring	Rear	68	×48.9	7.2%	Likely common fault pattern
2	Chassis condition (rear) Body, chassis, structure > Chassis > Chassis condition	Rear	66	×8.4	6.9%	Likely common fault pattern
3	Rigid brake pipes (front) Brakes > Rigid brake pipes	Front	65	×7.6	6.8%	Likely common fault pattern
4	Rear fog lamp Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Front and rear fog lamps > Rear fog lamp > Rear fog lamp	Any	106	×7.1	11.1%	Strong pattern — appears far more often than similar cars
5	Rigid brake pipes Brakes > Rigid brake pipes	Any	27	×6.3	2.8%	Possible elevated fault
6	Rear fog lamp (rear) Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Front and rear fog lamps > Rear fog lamp > Rear fog lamp	Rear	52	×5.9	5.5%	Likely common fault pattern
7	Rigid brake pipes (rear) Brakes > Rigid brake pipes	Rear	90	×5.4	9.5%	Likely common fault pattern
8	Wheel bearings (front) Suspension > Wheel bearings	Front	45	×3.2	4.7%	Likely common fault pattern
9	Malfunction indicator lamp Noise, emissions and leaks > Exhaust emissions > Compression ignition > Malfunction indicator lamp	Any	80	×3.0	8.4%	Possible elevated fault
10	Electronic stability control Brakes > ABS / EBS / ESC > Electronic stability control	Any	21	×3.0	2.2%	Possible elevated fault

Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown (at least 20 failures and 2.0× peer lift).

Advisories

Advisory items recorded on failed first-attempt tests that appear elevated versus peers. Advisories are not a fail rate — they flag issues noted at the test, often before they become failures.

#	Advisory pattern	Location	Notes	vs similar cars	Share	Confidence
1	Shackle pins and bushes (rear) Suspension > Springs > Leaf springs > Shackle pins and bushes	Rear	43	×155.4	4.5%	Elevated vs peers
2	Chassis condition Body, chassis, structure > Chassis > Chassis condition	Any	88	×11.4	9.3%	Elevated vs peers
3	Rigid brake pipes (front) Brakes > Rigid brake pipes	Front	191	×7.4	20.1%	Likely common fault pattern
4	Rigid brake pipes Brakes > Rigid brake pipes	Any	93	×5.5	9.8%	Possible elevated fault
5	Chassis condition (rear) Body, chassis, structure > Chassis > Chassis condition	Rear	49	×5.3	5.2%	Likely common fault pattern
6	Rigid brake pipes (rear) Brakes > Rigid brake pipes	Rear	189	×4.2	19.9%	Likely common fault pattern
7	Wheel bearings (front) Suspension > Wheel bearings	Front	34	×3.0	3.6%	Likely common fault pattern
8	Suspension arm (front) Suspension > Suspension arms > Suspension arm	Front	46	×2.9	4.8%	Elevated vs peers

FAQs

Is the 2009 Mitsubishi L200 reliable?

We do not show a single reliability score for the 2009 Mitsubishi L200 on this page. Among 951 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Rear fog lamp appears more often than on similar peer cars (about 7.1× more often than peers; 106 observed failures; 11.1% of failed tests). Treat this as a pre-purchase checklist from DVSA open data — not a guarantee for any individual car.

What common MOT faults stand out on the Mitsubishi L200 2009?

Among failed first-attempt tests we surface patterns that appear more often than on similar peer cars. Top example: Rear fog lamp (about 7.1× more often than peers; 106 observed failures; 11.1% of failed tests). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.

Why does Rear fog lamp stand out?

Rear fog lamp shows up more often than on similar peer cars (about 7.1× more often than peers; 106 observed failures; 11.1% of failed tests). That does not prove a causal design fault — age, mileage, and usage still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase check point, not a manufacturer TSB.

What are common problems with the 2009 Mitsubishi L200?

Common MOT problem areas for the 2009 Mitsubishi L200 include Rear fog lamp. These are elevated versus similar peer cars where lift clears our floors — not a full list of every possible fault on an individual car.

How should I read advisories vs fails?

Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that look elevated versus peers among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.

What does this Mitsubishi L200 2009 MOT report cover?

This page highlights elevated MOT failure patterns for the 2009 Mitsubishi L200 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are ranked against similar age and mileage peers. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics — not a full service history or manufacturer TSB list.

Does this include engine and gearbox problems?

No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

What is PRS, and why does it count as a fail?

PRS means the vehicle failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

About this data

Universe. UK class 4 cars only; normal MOT tests (not retests); results pass, PRS, or fail; one first test per vehicle per calendar year.

PRS policy. PRS means the vehicle failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

Peer baseline. We compare this model year with other class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year, excluding the whole model family so the car is not compared with itself (leave-one-out peer baseline).

Data years. Test years covered: 2024, 2025.

Limitations.

MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules — so this is not a full reliability score.
Common faults are inferred from MOT defect statistics, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
Matching on age and mileage reduces but does not remove every usage or maintenance difference between cars.
Pass rates and star scores appear only when those data marts are available; this page never invents them.

Display rules config: 1

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Most reliable Mitsubishi models

See brand-wide MOT rankings and year guidance for Mitsubishi (separate from this model-year report).