Isuzu D-Max 2015: reliability & common MOT faults

On the 2015 Isuzu D-Max, MOT failures for Rear fog lamp (rear) and Wheel bearings (front) show up more often than on similar cars of the same age and mileage. Figures come from UK DVSA open data for tests in 2025 (1,501 failed first-attempt tests). Figures are among first-attempt failed MOT tests, not among all tests.

1,501 failed first-attempt tests · 4,249 first tests (test year 2025)

Rear fog lamp (rear) — about 12× more often than on similar cars.

  • Rear fog lamp (rear) — about 12× more often than similar cars
  • Wheel bearings (front) — about 8.3× more often than similar cars
  • Exhaust system (rear) — about 5.1× more often than similar cars

Common faults

Failure patterns that show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars.

These MOT failure patterns show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars of the same class, age, and mileage.

Based on 1,501 failed first-attempt tests in 2025.

Rear fog lamp (rear)

This failure pattern appears about 12× more often than on similar cars — recorded on 195 failed first-attempt tests; 13.0% of failed tests for this model year.

Rear 195 failures ×12 13.0% of failed first tests Strong

Wheel bearings (front)

This failure pattern appears about 8.3× more often than on similar cars — recorded on 112 failed first-attempt tests; 7.5% of failed tests for this model year.

Front 112 failures ×8.3 7.5% of failed first tests Strong

Exhaust system (rear)

This failure pattern appears about 5.1× more often than on similar cars — recorded on 103 failed first-attempt tests; 6.9% of failed tests for this model year.

Rear 103 failures ×5.1 6.9% of failed first tests Strong

# Fault pattern Location Failures vs similar cars Share of fails Confidence
1 Pins and bushes (front)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Pins and bushes
Front 60 ×19 4.0% Likely
2 Rear fog lamp (rear)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Front and rear fog lamps > Rear fog lamp > Rear fog lamp
Rear 195 ×12 13.0% Strong
3 Wheel bearings (front)
Suspension > Wheel bearings
Front 112 ×8.3 7.5% Strong
4 Rigid brake pipes (front)
Brakes > Rigid brake pipes
Front 67 ×8.1 4.5% Likely
5 Emissions not tested
Noise, emissions and leaks > Exhaust emissions > Compression ignition > Emissions not tested
Any 52 ×8.0 3.5% Likely
6 Rigid brake pipes (rear)
Brakes > Rigid brake pipes
Rear 78 ×6.6 5.2% Likely
7 Reversing lamps
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Reversing lamps > Reversing lamps
Any 39 ×6.2 2.6% Likely
8 Exhaust system (rear)
Body, chassis, structure > Exhaust system
Rear 103 ×5.1 6.9% Strong
9 Shock absorbers (rear)
Suspension > Shock absorbers
Rear 156 ×4.7 10.4% Likely
10 Anti-lock braking system
Brakes > ABS / EBS / ESC > Anti-lock braking system
Any 86 ×4.3 5.7% Likely

Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown (at least 20 failures and about 2.0× more often than similar cars).

Note: Rates and comparisons are among first-attempt failed tests, not all MOTs. Patterns come from MOT defect codes — not manufacturer service bulletins, recalls, or a diagnosis of any individual car. Failures and advisories are listed separately.

Advisories

Notes recorded at the test that appear more often than on similar cars.

Advisory notes recorded on failed first-attempt tests that appear more often than on similar cars.

# Advisory pattern Location Notes vs similar cars Share Confidence
1 Shackle pins and bushes (rear)
Suspension > Springs > Leaf springs > Shackle pins and bushes
Rear 23 ×48 1.5% Elevated
2 Wheel bearings (front)
Suspension > Wheel bearings
Front 337 ×37 22.5% Strong
3 Pins and bushes (front)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Pins and bushes
Front 81 ×19 5.4% Likely
4 Chassis condition (rear)
Body, chassis, structure > Chassis > Chassis condition
Rear 24 ×12 1.6% Elevated
5 Flexible brake hoses (front)
Brakes > Flexible brake hoses
Front 38 ×11 2.5% Elevated
6 Rigid brake pipes (front)
Brakes > Rigid brake pipes
Front 169 ×6.8 11.3% Likely
7 Rigid brake pipes (rear)
Brakes > Rigid brake pipes
Rear 200 ×6.2 13.3% Likely
8 Suspension arm (front)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Suspension arm
Front 29 ×4.4 1.9% Elevated
Note: Advisories are not a fail rate — they flag issues noted at the test, often before they become failures.

FAQs

Short answers about how to read this model-year guide.

We do not show a single reliability score for the 2015 Isuzu D-Max on this page. Among 1,501 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Rear fog lamp (rear) appears more often than on similar cars (about 12× more often than similar cars; 195 observed failures; 13.0% of failed tests). Treat this as a pre-purchase checklist from DVSA open data — not a guarantee for any individual car.
Among failed first-attempt tests we highlight patterns that appear more often than on similar cars. Top example: Rear fog lamp (rear) (about 12× more often than similar cars; 195 observed failures; 13.0% of failed tests). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Rear fog lamp (rear) shows up more often than on similar cars (about 12× more often than similar cars; 195 observed failures; 13.0% of failed tests). That does not prove a design fault — age, mileage, and how the car was used still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase check point, not a manufacturer service bulletin.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2015 Isuzu D-Max include Rear fog lamp (rear), Wheel bearings (front), Exhaust system (rear). These patterns show up more often than on similar cars after we filter out sparse noise — not a full list of every possible fault on an individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that appear more often than on similar cars among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights MOT failure patterns for the 2015 Isuzu D-Max (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are compared with cars of a similar age and mileage. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics — not a full service history or manufacturer service-bulletin list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.
PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

About this data

How this page is built and what it can (and can't) say.

These figures come from UK MOT open data for this model year. We surface common failure patterns against similar cars — not a full reliability score, and not a pass/fail verdict on any individual vehicle.

2024 2025

What we include

UK Class 4 cars only. Normal MOT tests (not retests); first test per vehicle per calendar year; results pass, PRS, or fail.

Same-day repairs

PRS means the car failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

How we compare

We compare this model year with other Class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year. This model family is left out of the peer group so the car is not measured against itself.

What this does not cover

  • MOTs do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronics — this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults come from MOT defect stats, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Age and mileage matching reduces — but does not remove — differences in how cars were used and maintained.
  • We never invent pass rates, star scores, or ranks when those data marts are missing.

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Most reliable Isuzu models

See brand-wide MOT rankings and year guidance for Isuzu (separate from this model-year report).