Model Reports 8 min read Updated 12 Jul 2026

Dacia Sandero 2017: reliability & common MOT faults

Elevated MOT failure patterns for the 2017 Dacia Sandero include Anti-roll bars — Linkage (front) (~51.7× peers) and Linkage pins and bushes (front) (~43.5× peers). Based on UK DVSA open data for test year 2025 (4,901 failed first-attempt tests), compared with similar age and mileage peers. Available test years: 2024, 2025.

4,901 failed first-attempt tests · 14,146 first tests (test year 2025)

Standout pattern: Anti-roll bars — Linkage (front) — about 51.7× more often than on similar peer cars.

Key takeaways before you buy

Anti-roll bars — Linkage (front): about 51.7× more often than similar cars
Linkage pins and bushes (front): about 43.5× more often than similar cars
Headlamp levelling device: about 13.0× more often than similar cars

Common faults

These are MOT failure patterns that show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars of the same class, age band, and mileage in the same test year (leave-one-out peer comparison; whole model family excluded).

Statistical patterns from MOT defect codes — not manufacturer TSBs, recalls, or a diagnosis of any individual car. Fail and advisory patterns are kept separate.

Based on 4,901 failed first-attempt tests in test year 2025.

Anti-roll bars — Linkage (front)

This failure pattern appears about 51.7× more often than on similar peer cars — recorded on 345 failed first-attempt tests; 7.0% of failed tests for this model year.

Front · 345 failures · ×51.7 vs similar cars · 7.0% of failed first tests · Strong pattern — appears far more often than similar cars

Linkage pins and bushes (front)

This failure pattern appears about 43.5× more often than on similar peer cars — recorded on 184 failed first-attempt tests; 3.8% of failed tests for this model year.

Front · 184 failures · ×43.5 vs similar cars · 3.8% of failed first tests · Strong pattern — appears far more often than similar cars

Headlamp levelling device

This failure pattern appears about 13.0× more often than on similar peer cars — recorded on 104 failed first-attempt tests; 2.1% of failed tests for this model year.

Any · 104 failures · ×13.0 vs similar cars · 2.1% of failed first tests · Strong pattern — appears far more often than similar cars

#	Fault pattern	Location	Failures	vs similar cars	Share of fails	Confidence
1	Anti-roll bars — Linkage (front) Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Linkage	Front	345	×51.7	7.0%	Strong pattern — appears far more often than similar cars
2	Linkage pins and bushes (front) Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Linkage pins and bushes	Front	184	×43.5	3.8%	Strong pattern — appears far more often than similar cars
3	Headlamp levelling device Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Headlamps > Headlamp levelling device	Any	104	×13.0	2.1%	Strong pattern — appears far more often than similar cars
4	Drive shafts — Joints (front) Body, chassis, structure > Transmission > Drive shafts > Joints	Front	530	×3.6	10.8%	Likely common fault pattern
5	Coil spring (front) Suspension > Springs > Coil springs > Coil spring	Front	693	×2.9	14.1%	Possible elevated fault
6	Catalyst emissions Noise, emissions and leaks > Exhaust emissions > Spark ignition > Catalyst emissions	Any	221	×2.4	4.5%	Possible elevated fault
7	Headlamp (front) Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Headlamps > Headlamp	Front	233	×2.0	4.8%	Possible elevated fault

Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown (at least 20 failures and 2.0× peer lift).

Wear patterns

These patterns look like wear or usage effects rather than model-specific design faults. Tyres, brake friction material, and alignment-related defects often track mileage and road use. They are not treated as a model design fault in our common-faults ranking.

#	Pattern	Location	Failures	vs similar cars	Share of fails	Confidence
1	Headlamp aim (front) Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Headlamp aim > Headlamp aim	Front	505	×2.8	10.3%	Wear / usage pattern — not treated as a model design fault
2	Headlamp aim Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Headlamp aim > Headlamp aim	Any	563	×2.4	11.5%	Wear / usage pattern — not treated as a model design fault
3	Headlamp aim not tested Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Headlamp aim > Headlamp aim not tested	Any	42	×2.2	0.9%	Wear / usage pattern — not treated as a model design fault
4	Headlamp aim not tested (front) Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Headlamp aim > Headlamp aim not tested	Front	28	×2.0	0.6%	Wear / usage pattern — not treated as a model design fault

Advisories

Advisory items recorded on failed first-attempt tests that appear elevated versus peers. Advisories are not a fail rate — they flag issues noted at the test, often before they become failures.

#	Advisory pattern	Location	Notes	vs similar cars	Share	Confidence
1	Linkage pins and bushes (front) Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Linkage pins and bushes	Front	143	×15.9	2.9%	Strong pattern — appears far more often than similar cars
2	Stop lamp (rear) Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Stop lamp	Rear	27	×6.5	0.6%	Elevated vs peers
3	Stop lamp Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Stop lamp	Any	51	×6.4	1.0%	Elevated vs peers
4	Pins and bushes (front) Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Pins and bushes	Front	32	×4.8	0.7%	Likely common fault pattern
5	Suspension arm (front) Suspension > Suspension arms > Suspension arm	Front	51	×4.5	1.0%	Elevated vs peers
6	Sub-frame (front) Suspension > Sub-frames > Sub-frame	Front	81	×3.9	1.7%	Elevated vs peers
7	Pedal Brakes > Service brake pedal or hand lever > Pedal	Any	28	×3.9	0.6%	Elevated vs peers
8	Macpherson strut (front) Suspension > Macpherson strut > Macpherson strut	Front	22	×3.2	0.4%	Elevated vs peers

FAQs

Is the 2017 Dacia Sandero reliable?

We do not show a single reliability score for the 2017 Dacia Sandero on this page. Among 4,901 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Anti-roll bars — Linkage (front) appears more often than on similar peer cars (about 51.7× more often than peers; 345 observed failures; 7.0% of failed tests). Treat this as a pre-purchase checklist from DVSA open data — not a guarantee for any individual car.

What common MOT faults stand out on the Dacia Sandero 2017?

Among failed first-attempt tests we surface patterns that appear more often than on similar peer cars. Top example: Anti-roll bars — Linkage (front) (about 51.7× more often than peers; 345 observed failures; 7.0% of failed tests). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.

Why does Anti-roll bars — Linkage (front) stand out?

Anti-roll bars — Linkage (front) shows up more often than on similar peer cars (about 51.7× more often than peers; 345 observed failures; 7.0% of failed tests). That does not prove a causal design fault — age, mileage, and usage still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase check point, not a manufacturer TSB.

What are common problems with the 2017 Dacia Sandero?

Common MOT problem areas for the 2017 Dacia Sandero include Anti-roll bars — Linkage (front), Linkage pins and bushes (front), Headlamp levelling device. These are elevated versus similar peer cars where lift clears our floors — not a full list of every possible fault on an individual car.

How should I read advisories vs fails?

Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that look elevated versus peers among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.

What does this Dacia Sandero 2017 MOT report cover?

This page highlights elevated MOT failure patterns for the 2017 Dacia Sandero (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are ranked against similar age and mileage peers. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics — not a full service history or manufacturer TSB list.

Does this include engine and gearbox problems?

No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.

What is PRS, and why does it count as a fail?

PRS means the vehicle failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

About this data

Universe. UK class 4 cars only; normal MOT tests (not retests); results pass, PRS, or fail; one first test per vehicle per calendar year.

PRS policy. PRS means the vehicle failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

Peer baseline. We compare this model year with other class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year, excluding the whole model family so the car is not compared with itself (leave-one-out peer baseline).

Data years. Test years covered: 2024, 2025.

Limitations.

MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules — so this is not a full reliability score.
Common faults are inferred from MOT defect statistics, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
Matching on age and mileage reduces but does not remove every usage or maintenance difference between cars.
Pass rates and star scores appear only when those data marts are available; this page never invents them.

Display rules config: 1

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.

Most reliable Dacia models

See brand-wide MOT rankings and year guidance for Dacia (separate from this model-year report).