Audi Q5 2013: reliability & common MOT faults

Elevated MOT failure patterns for the 2013 Audi Q5 include Headlamp levelling device (rear) (~52.6× peers) and Linkage pins and bushes (front) (~12.6× peers). Based on UK DVSA open data for test year 2025 (1,342 failed first-attempt tests), compared with similar age and mileage peers. Available test years: 2024, 2025.

Key takeaways before you buy

  • Headlamp levelling device (rear): about 52.6× more often than similar cars
  • Linkage pins and bushes (front): about 12.6× more often than similar cars
  • Pins and bushes (front): about 3.1× more often than similar cars

Common faults

These are MOT failure patterns that show up more often on this registration year than on similar cars of the same class, age band, and mileage in the same test year (leave-one-out peer comparison; whole model family excluded).

Statistical patterns from MOT defect codes — not manufacturer TSBs, recalls, or a diagnosis of any individual car. Fail and advisory patterns are kept separate.

Based on 1,342 failed first-attempt tests in test year 2025.

Headlamp levelling device (rear)

This failure pattern appears about 52.6× more often than on similar peer cars — recorded on 51 failed first-attempt tests; 3.8% of failed tests for this model year.

Rear · 51 failures · ×52.6 vs similar cars · 3.8% of failed first tests · Likely common fault pattern

Linkage pins and bushes (front)

This failure pattern appears about 12.6× more often than on similar peer cars — recorded on 34 failed first-attempt tests; 2.5% of failed tests for this model year.

Front · 34 failures · ×12.6 vs similar cars · 2.5% of failed first tests · Likely common fault pattern

No patterns met the strongest callout thresholds on this page; showing the highest-lift rows that still cleared the display floors.

# Fault pattern Location Failures vs similar cars Share of fails Confidence
1 Headlamp levelling device (rear)
Lamps, reflectors and electrical equipment > Headlamps > Headlamp levelling device
Rear 51 ×52.6 3.8% Likely common fault pattern
2 Linkage pins and bushes (front)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Linkage pins and bushes
Front 34 ×12.6 2.5% Likely common fault pattern
3 Pins and bushes (front)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Pins and bushes
Front 201 ×3.1 15.0% Likely common fault pattern
4 Drive shafts — Joints (front)
Body, chassis, structure > Transmission > Drive shafts > Joints
Front 189 ×2.8 14.1% Possible elevated fault
5 Malfunction indicator lamp
Noise, emissions and leaks > Exhaust emissions > Compression ignition > Malfunction indicator lamp
Any 69 ×2.1 5.1% Possible elevated fault
6 Ball joint dust cover (front)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Ball joint dust cover
Front 48 ×2.1 3.6% Possible elevated fault

Only patterns that clear minimum sample and elevation thresholds are shown (at least 20 failures and 2.0× peer lift).

Advisories

Advisory items recorded on failed first-attempt tests that appear elevated versus peers. Advisories are not a fail rate — they flag issues noted at the test, often before they become failures.

# Advisory pattern Location Notes vs similar cars Share Confidence
1 Linkage pins and bushes (front)
Suspension > Anti-roll bars > Linkage pins and bushes
Front 22 ×5.4 1.6% Likely common fault pattern
2 Pins and bushes (front)
Suspension > Suspension arms > Pins and bushes
Front 370 ×3.4 27.6% Likely common fault pattern
3 Sub-frame (rear)
Suspension > Sub-frames > Sub-frame
Rear 85 ×2.1 6.3% Elevated vs peers

FAQs

We do not show a single reliability score for the 2013 Audi Q5 on this page. Among 1,342 failed first-attempt MOT tests (test year 2025), Headlamp levelling device (rear) appears more often than on similar peer cars (about 52.6× more often than peers; 51 observed failures; 3.8% of failed tests). Treat this as a pre-purchase checklist from DVSA open data — not a guarantee for any individual car.
Among failed first-attempt tests we surface patterns that appear more often than on similar peer cars. Top example: Headlamp levelling device (rear) (about 52.6× more often than peers; 51 observed failures; 3.8% of failed tests). These are statistical signals, not a diagnosis of any individual car.
Headlamp levelling device (rear) shows up more often than on similar peer cars (about 52.6× more often than peers; 51 observed failures; 3.8% of failed tests). That does not prove a causal design fault — age, mileage, and usage still matter. Treat it as a pre-purchase check point, not a manufacturer TSB.
Common MOT problem areas for the 2013 Audi Q5 include Headlamp levelling device (rear), Linkage pins and bushes (front), Pins and bushes (front). These are elevated versus similar peer cars where lift clears our floors — not a full list of every possible fault on an individual car.
Advisories flag issues noted at the test and are not a fail rate. We show advisory patterns that look elevated versus peers among failed first-attempt tests, separate from common failure rows. Use them as early-warning checks, not as a pass/fail score.
This page highlights elevated MOT failure patterns for the 2013 Audi Q5 (registration year) using UK DVSA open data for the selected test year. Patterns are ranked against similar age and mileage peers. It is a buyer checklist from MOT defect statistics — not a full service history or manufacturer TSB list.
No. MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules. Patterns here come from MOT defect statistics only and should not be read as engine or gearbox reliability scores.
PRS means the vehicle failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

About this data

Universe. UK class 4 cars only; normal MOT tests (not retests); results pass, PRS, or fail; one first test per vehicle per calendar year.

PRS policy. PRS means the vehicle failed items that were fixed at the test station and then passed the same day. We count PRS as a first-attempt fail in headline rates so same-day repairs do not hide problems.

Peer baseline. We compare this model year with other class 4 cars of similar age and mileage in the same test year, excluding the whole model family so the car is not compared with itself (leave-one-out peer baseline).

Data years. Test years covered: 2024, 2025.

Limitations.

  • MOT tests do not cover engine internals, gearboxes, or many electronic modules — so this is not a full reliability score.
  • Common faults are inferred from MOT defect statistics, not manufacturer TSBs or recalls.
  • Matching on age and mileage reduces but does not remove every usage or maintenance difference between cars.
  • Pass rates and star scores appear only when those data marts are available; this page never invents them.

Display rules config: 1

Contains public sector information licensed under the Open Government Licence v3.0.